4 protocols just cleared $1M+ in daily volume:
• Meteora - $1.94M
• Jupiter - $1.6M
• Raydium - $1.41M
• Axiom - $1.12M
More than stats. This signals rotation into Solana-native liquidity venues.
Some positives:
• DEX wars heating up.
• LPs are chasing yield and emissions.
• Newcomers (like Axiom) aren't just noise. They're earning flows.

In just 1Y, @Lombard_Finance’s TVL grew from $251M to $1.56B. This remarkable 521% increase clearly stamps its position as a major player in DeFi.
The growth is more than just numbers. It reflects a shift in how users and institutions view Lombard’s role in unlocking Bitcoin’s utility.
The success of $LBTC proves there’s demand for a secure, cross chain, yield bearing BTC solution.
It’s BTC szn….

Sat on my laptop earlier today, and I found myself thinking about how difficult it must have been to use computers in their early days, back when there were no Operating Systems.
Computers required low level control that only trained experts could manage. You had to understand hardware, write in machine code, and manually operate everything.
It wasn’t built for the average user just like how many blockchains feel today.
That’s exactly the kind of problem @anoma is solving.
Anoma acts like an operating system for blockchains. Just like your laptop runs on macOS or Windows, hiding the complexity

Most infra optimizes for speed.
INFINIT optimizes for alignment.
Here's where the system stalled: 🧵
For the last decade, we’ve obsessed over execution layers.
Cheaper swaps. Faster confirmations. Parallel threads.
But the next 100x won’t come from latency. It’ll come from orchestration.
The real problem isn’t speed.
It’s misalignment between; agents, capital, and time.
→ The Cost of Uncoordinated Capital
DeFi today is a loose mesh of autonomous actors:
• Vaults operate in isolation
• Agents farm local yield curves
• DAOs rebalance on calendar time, not market conditions
• Strategies fight eac

📑 For the last 15 years, crypto has taught us one thing:
Consensus is coordination.
It’s how networks agree on what’s true.
Bitcoin did this with hashpower.
Ethereum added validator signatures.
Both created systems where financial truth could be verified without trust, without banks.
But we’re entering a new era.
One where the question isn’t “which transaction is valid?”
But “which answer is true?”
————————————————————
➩ From Financial Truth to Cognitive Truth
Crypto’s first phase was about coordinating money.
• Is this tx valid?
• Is this balance correct?
• Is this block final?
But the rise

In an ever evolving world of blockchains and dApps, cross-chain composability has become more promising and even necessary for a multi-chain eco.
Most projects claim to solve it, few even understand it, but in practice, most solutions fall short.
What does true composability across chains actually look like?
To answer that, we need to look at what @anoma is building:
Today, dApps are partitioned. Each chain is its own world, with its own rules, assets, and logic. Even the most basic interactions across chains like swapping ETH for SOL often require bridges, wrappers, complex wallets, and cen

We’ve seen $BTC in DeFi before.
Mostly through wrapped assets. Mostly bridged.
And mostly broken.
The issue wasn’t demand. It was design.
Now, @Lombard_Finance is flipping the model with something deceptively powerful:
A vault routing engine that unlocks native composability across protocols.
Let’s delve into the mechanics, shall we?
————————————————————
1️⃣ Vault Hooks = Custom Logic at In/Outflows
Every $LBTC vault is wired with on-chain hooks.
That means strategy creators can inject logic at three levels:
+ On Deposit
+ On Withdrawal
+ On Routing
Hooks can trigger anything from auto-staking

📑 If you've used a dApp that touches more than one chain, you know the pain.
You want to make a trade:
- the liquidity is on another chain
- you bridge
- you wait
- you sign multiple transactions
- you hope nothing breaks.
This isn’t “user experience.” It’s ops work disguised as UX.
Even with all the bridges, relayers, routers, and aggregators in the world, most apps are still bound by one assumption:
The user must push every transaction, know where assets are, and manually chain-hop to get what they want.
This is where 'intent solvers' come in.
————————————————————
➩ From Transactions to Int

📑 We’re told stablecoins are the backbone of crypto.
But most of them? They’re passive wrappers on T-bills or fiat.
No routing logic. No native yield. No systemic liquidity unlock.
It’s 2025, and we’re still treating dollars onchain like static IOUs.
————————————————————
➩ Introducing a Smarter Stable
$RUSD is not just backed by real assets. It moves across strategies.
It flows. And that flow unlocks its edge:
• Real-world yield
• Onchain composability
• Cross-chain liquidity provisioning
• Autonomous rebalancing
————————————————————
➩ How $RUSD Generates Real Yield
Most “yield-bearing” stabl

📑 RWAs Are a Dead-End Without Liquidity Routing. Novastro Solves This.
Treasuries are on-chain. Real estate deals are getting fractionalized. Stablecoin demand is being restructured around yield-bearing government bonds.
But behind the narrative pumps and regulatory excitement, there’s one systemic failure that’s become increasingly obvious:
They don’t yield.
They don’t circulate.
They don’t compose with DeFi.
They sit on-chain, mapped to legal wrappers and PDFs, offering exposure, but no real motion. And motion is everything in crypto.
——————————————————
➩ The Illiquidity Trap in RWA Protoco

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗲: 𝗔𝗻 𝗘𝗩𝗠, 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗢𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀.
We’re used to thinking in terms of transactions, addresses, and smart contracts. But what if users didn’t have to think that way at all? What if they could simply state their goal and the system handled everything?
That’s exactly what the Intent Machine (IM) does.
Just as EVM executes smart contract code and produces state changes, Anoma’s Intent Machine transforms user goals into real blockchain actions. It’s the engine at the heart of intent-based UX — a new way of interacting with blockchains where you express

But here’s the question nobody’s asking:
What happens after they arrive?
This is the part most RWA protocols haven’t figured out yet.
Let’s break it down.
---
➩ The Next Phase of On-Chain Capital
Crypto yield started with emissions. Then came staking. Then came vaults.
But all of those were static.
You deposited. You hoped. You stayed locked in while the market changed.
Novastro’s AI vault rebalancer breaks that model.
It gives you a moving, adaptive, composable layer on top of real-world assets, one that:
• Tracks where yield is
• Reallocates across vaults
• Adjusts to market shifts
• And kee

Most projects come and go chasing hype. Some launch flashy Layer 2s. Others tout marginal innovations wrapped in buzzwords. But while the spotlight stays fixed on what’s trending, anoma is quietly building something far more ambitious
Anoma isn’t just another blockchain — it’s the operating system for the next internet. At first glance, you might mistake Anoma for yet another blockchain. But it’s something entirely different — and far more powerful.
Anoma is building a universal intent engine and a full-stack coordination layer that redefines how users interact with decentralized systems.
𝗧�

- Storage → Filecoin
- Compute → Aethir,
- Truth → Chainlink, UMA
Each created a public market for once-centralized infrastructure.
But we’ve missed a critical layer; 𝗩𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗠𝗲𝗮𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴.
In an AI-native world, models generate answers, code, decisions; but there’s no system verifying if they’re correct.
Unlike most AI x crypto projects, Mira doesn’t build models.
It builds verification infrastructure.
•
➩ How It Works:
1. AI outputs are split into atomic claims
2. Claims are routed to diverse LLMs (GPT, Claude, LLaMA)
3. Models vote on correctness
4. Consensus forms
5. Output is v

The Web3 ecosystem suffers from fragmentation, complexity, and privacy issues. Blockchains like Ethereum, Solana, and Cosmos operate independently, complicating cross-chain interactions and restricting liquidity and user access.
Users encounter confusing experiences, grappling with intricate processes such as bridging assets or managing chain-specific wallets.
It aims to simplify dApp development and user experience through the following key integrations:
⟜ Intent-Centric Architecture
⟜ Cross-Chain Interoperability
⟜ Privacy via Zero-Knowledge Proofs
⟜ Scalability with Fractal Scaling
⟜ Simpl

RWA is the most obvious trend people still underestimate.
Not because the charts aren’t pumping — but because the infrastructure is.
And the market?
Already at $12.79B TVL, growing quietly +3.2% MoM.
This is how the next phase of DeFi sneaks in — stable, liquid, and institutional.
RWAs aren’t hype.
They’re the rails.

I’ve been sitting with this question:
What makes Bitcoin win in this next cycle — beyond just ETF flows and halvings?
My answer? Capital efficiency.
The last cycle crowned $ETH as king of productive capital — staked, restaked, LP’d, composable across DeFi.
Bitcoin? Still mostly cold. Custodied. Passive.
That’s not going to cut it anymore.
Because if BTC is going to compete for liquidity, it has to earn.
This is where $LBTC comes in — Bitcoin’s most serious shot at becoming usable, yield-bearing, and DeFi-native.
I’ve tested it, read the contracts, followed the vaults.
It’s a vault-collateraliz

Few make them legally enforceable.
Even fewer make them usable across chains or composable in DeFi.
The mechanism that makes it all work? DTC — a Digital Twin Container.
Let me break it down.
•
➩ The Core Problem: Fragmentation
RWAs don’t scale because compliance doesn’t scale.
Every region has different legal rules, KYC flows, and investor frameworks.
Most RWA projects ignore this. They wrap an asset in an ERC-20 and call it done.
The result?
•
➩ What’s a DTC?
A Digital Twin Container is a programmable smart contract that represents the entire lifecycle of a real asset.
It includes:
- Legal s

Over the last decade, crypto has built almost everything needed to support a new financial system.
We now have:
• Trust-minimized money ( $ETH, $BTC, stablecoins)
• Yield primitives (Lido, Pendle, Curve)
• Execution layers (Rollups, EigenLayer AVS)
But one thing has always been missing:
Real-world value. Real-world assets. Real-world liquidity.
Assets like real estate, bonds, and commodities have remained mostly off-chain.
1️⃣ Settlement Layer — Movement Network (MoveVM) and EigenLayer AVS provide security, speed, and modular scaling.
2️⃣ Execution Layer — Novastro L2 supports high-frequency R