Economists discuss: The impact of the total supply of BTC and its smallest unit on the perception of scarcity.

Recently, a well-known economist raised a thought-provoking question on social media: What would be different if the total supply of Bitcoin was 21 billion coins instead of the current 21 million coins? He further speculated whether redefining each Bitcoin as 100,000 Satoshi instead of the current 1 million Satoshi would affect people's perception of its scarcity.

The economist pointed out that the number "100 million" is essentially just an artificially set unit. He believes that the total supply of Bitcoin is not the key; what truly matters is the total amount of the smallest unit - Satoshi. This view has sparked widespread discussion in the cryptocurrency community.

This thought actually touches upon the core issue of value perception in cryptocurrency. It reminds us that when assessing the scarcity of digital assets, we should not only focus on the superficial numbers, but should deeply understand their underlying structure and minimum unit of measurement.

The emergence of this viewpoint also reflects the ongoing discussion about the standards of value measurement in the cryptocurrency field. As the industry develops, understanding and assessing the value of digital assets correctly will continue to be an important topic worthy of in-depth study.